4.4 Article

Low energy peripheral scaling in nucleon-nucleon scattering and uncertainty quantification

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/aaabd2

Keywords

nucleon-nucleon interaction; nucleon-nucleon phase-shifts; peripheral scaling; long range correlations; partial wave analysis

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  2. European FEDER funds [FIS2014-59386-P, FIS2017-85053-C2-1-P]
  3. Agencia de Innovacion y Desarrollo de Andalucia [FQM225]
  4. US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  5. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0008511]
  6. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-93ER-40756]
  7. MINECO (Spain) [IJCI-2014-20038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze the peripheral structure of the nucleon-nucleon interaction for LAB energies below 350 MeV. To this end we transform the scattering matrix into the impact parameter representation by analyzing the scaled phase shifts (L + 1/2)delta(JLS) (p) and the scaled mixing parameters (L + 1/2)epsilon(JLS)(p) in terms of the impact parameter b = (L + 1/2)/p. According to the eikonal approximation, at large angular momentum L these functions should become an universal function of b, independent on L. This allows to discuss in a rather transparent way the role of statistical and systematic uncertainties in the different long range components of the two-body potential. Implications for peripheral waves obtained in chiral perturbation theory interactions to fifth order (N5LO) or from the large body of NN data considered in the SAID partial wave analysis are also drawn from comparing them with other phenomenological high-quality interactions, constructed to fit scattering data as well. We find that both N5LO and SAID peripheral waves disagree more than 5 sigma with the Granada-2013 statistical analysis, more than 2 sigma with the 6 statistically equivalent potentials fitting the Granada-2013 database and about 1 sigma with the historical set of 13 high-quality potentials developed since the 1993 Nijmegen analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available