4.5 Article

In search of appropriate measures of periodontal status: The Periodontal Profile Phenotype (P-3) system

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 166-175

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0424

Keywords

Diagnosis; epidemiology; gingivitis; periodontitis

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN2682011 00005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268 201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, HHSN26820 1100012C]
  2. NIH/NIDCR [R01-DE021418, R01-DE021986, K23-DE025093]
  3. NIH/NCRR [UL1-TR001111]
  4. [R01-DE023836]
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR001111] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [K23DE025093, R01DE021418, R01DE023836, T90DE021986] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThis paper focuses on Periodontal Profile Class (PPC), a component of the Periodontal Profile Phenotype (P-3) System that may be more representative of the periodontitis phenotype than current case definitions of periodontitis. Data illustrate the unique aspects of the PPC compared with other commonly used periodontal classification indices. MethodsLatent Class Analysis (LCA) identified discrete classes of individuals grouped by tooth-level clinical parameters. The analysis defined seven distinct periodontal profile classes (PPC A through G) and seven distinct tooth profile classes (TPC A through G). This LCA classification was an entirely data-derived agnostic process without any preconceived presumptions of what constituted disease. ResultsComparing the PPC with the Centers for Disease Control/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP) and European indices, the PPC is unique in that it contains four disease classes not traditionally used. Less than half of individuals classified as Healthy by both the CDC/AAP and European indices were Healthy using the PPC. About 25% of those classified as Severe by CDC/AAP and European indices were PPC-Severe. The remainder spread out over the High Gingival Index, Posterior Disease, Tooth Loss, and Severe Tooth Loss phenotypes. ConclusionsThe PPC classification provides a significant departure from the traditional clinical case status indices that have been used, but has resulted in clinical phenotypes that are quite familiar to most clinicians who take notice of the distribution of missing teeth, areas of recession, diminished periodontal support, and other aspects of the dentition while conducting a periodontal examination. The mutually exclusive categories provided by the PPC system provide periodontal clinical summaries that can be an important component of precision dentistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available