4.4 Review

New insights into necrotizing enterocolitis: From laboratory observation to personalized prevention and treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 398-404

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.012

Keywords

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC); Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4); Innate immunity; Breast milk; Probiotics; Prematurity

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM078238, R01DK083752, T32DK007713, K08DK101608, R03DK111473]
  2. March of Dimes Foundation [5-FY17-79]
  3. Children's Discovery Institute of Washington University
  4. St. Louis Children's Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/purpose: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating disease of prematurity that develops after feeding, often without warning, and results in diffuse intestinal necrosis leading to sepsis and death in many cases. The lack of improvement in overall survival is influenced by nonspecific diagnostic modalities as well as inexact and nonpersonalized treatment strategies. Methods/Results: Recently, we and others have shown that NEC develops in response to exaggerated bacterial signaling in the premature intestine, as a consequence of elevated expression and activity of the bacterial receptor toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which is important for normal gut development. Breast milk is a powerful TLR4 inhibitor, while mutations in TLR4 genes lead to increased NEC risk in humans, providing proof-of-concept for its role in NEC. Recently, a drug discovery approach has revealed a novel class of TLR4 inhibitors which are being developed for personalized approaches to NEC treatment. Conclusion: This review will highlight the current understanding of the role of bacterial signaling in NEC pathogenesis, and will describe advances in diagnosis, prevention and treatment of NEC that may hopefully improve survival for these most fragile patients. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available