Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-8
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2018-06-09
DOI
10.1080/01443615.2018.1463206
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Saudi Arabia
- (2016) Hazem Mahmoud Al-Mandeel et al. ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- (2016) Li Li et al. OncoTargets and Therapy
- Incisal margin condition after LEEP for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia patients and prognosis
- (2016) Hong Chen et al. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- (2015) Nancy Santesso et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of CIN: classical LLETZ (large-loop excision of the transformation zone) versus isolated resection of the colposcopic apparent lesion – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Theresa M. Schwarz et al. Trials
- Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
- (2015) Heather A. Frey et al. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Cervical conisation and the risk of preterm delivery: a retrospective matched pair analysis of a German cohort
- (2014) Verena Kirn et al. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
- Pregnancy Outcome after the Treatment of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- (2014) Yi Liu et al. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION
- Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- (2013) Antonio Frega et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- The relationship between previous treatment for cervical dysplasia and preterm delivery in twin gestations
- (2013) Robert M. Ehsanipoor et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and the Risk for Preterm Delivery
- (2013) Annu Heinonen et al. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2011) FJ Bruinsma et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- (2011) Daniel Andía et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
- Obstetric Outcomes After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- (2011) Ana Furtado Lima et al. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
- Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
- (2010) Andreas Stang EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy
- (2009) G Ørtoft et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- The treatment of CIN: what are the risks?
- (2009) W. Prendiville CYTOPATHOLOGY
- Pregnancy Outcome After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
- (2009) Smruta Shanbhag et al. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started