Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 406-415
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Online
2018-01-26
DOI
10.3171/2017.11.spine17643
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A comparison between different outcome measures based on “meaningful important differences” in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
- (2016) Maria M. Wertli et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Only walking matters—assessment following lumbar stenosis decompression
- (2016) S. Budithi et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2016) Peter Försth et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
- (2016) Zoher Ghogawala et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study
- (2015) C Röder et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients
- (2015) Freyr G. Sigmundsson et al. Spine Journal
- Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study
- (2014) Ho-Joong Kim et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Decompression Only Versus Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis in Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old: Which is Reasonable?
- (2013) Chang-Hyun LEE et al. NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA
- Readmission Rates After Decompression Surgery in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries
- (2013) Urvij Modhia et al. SPINE
- Decompression and Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization Compared With Decompression and Instrumented Spinal Fusion for Spinal Stenosis and Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
- (2013) Reginald J. Davis et al. SPINE
- Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial
- (2013) W. A. Moojen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults
- (2010) Richard A. Deyo JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Does an interspinous device (Coflex™) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients
- (2009) Alexander Richter et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- The Influence of Preoperative Back Pain on the Outcome of Lumbar Decompression Surgery
- (2009) Frank S. Kleinstück et al. SPINE
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2008) James N. Weinstein et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now