4.7 Article

Reduced ex vivo release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and elevated plasma interleukin-6 are inflammatory signatures of post-stroke delirium

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1156-y

Keywords

Delirium; Cytokines; Stroke; Inflammation

Funding

  1. National Science Center [2015/19/B/NZ4/00287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Experimental studies suggest that systemic inflammation contributes to the pathophysiology of delirium. The aim of our study was to determine blood-derived inflammatory signatures of post-stroke delirium. Methods: We included 144 ischemic stroke patients. We assessed delirium on a daily basis during the first 7 days of hospitalization. Venous blood was collected at day 3 after the onset of stroke and stimulated ex vivo with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We measured LPS-induced cytokine concentration (TNF alpha, IP-10, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12p70) as well as plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF alpha. Results: Delirium was diagnosed in 21.5% of patients. After correction for monocyte count, patients with delirium had reduced LPS-induced TNF alpha, IP-10, IL-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-12 release. The plasma IL-6 level was higher in delirious patients compared to patients without delirium. After adjusting for stroke severity and infections, higher ex vivo TNF alpha (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.72, P = 0.01), IP-10 (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.73, P = 0.01), IL-1 beta (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.89, P = 0.02), and IL-12 (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.70, P = 0.02) release was associated with the reduced risk of delirium. In multivariate analysis, the higher plasma IL-6 was associated with the increased risk of delirium (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.00-2.58, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Reduced ex vivo release of pro-inflammatory cytokines after LPS stimulation and the elevated plasma IL-6 are signatures of post-stroke delirium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available