4.6 Article

Identification of Cellular Sources of IL-2 Needed for Regulatory T Cell Development and Homeostasis

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 200, Issue 12, Pages 3926-3933

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800097

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P30CA77598]
  2. NIH [T32 AI07313, F30 DK096844, R01 HL11879, R56AI113138, R01 AI124512]
  3. University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cytokine IL-2 is critical for promoting the development, homeostasis, and function of regulatory T (Treg) cells. The cellular sources of IL-2 that promote these processes remain unclear. T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells (DCs) are known to make IL-2 in peripheral tissues. We found that T cells and DCs in the thymus also make IL-2. To identify cellular sources of IL-2 in Treg cell development and homeostasis, we used Il2(FL/FL) mice to selectively delete Il2 in T cells, B cells, and DCs. Because IL-15 can partially substitute for IL-2 in Treg cell development, we carried out the majority of these studies on an Il15(-/-) background. Deletion of Il2 in B cells, DCs, or both these subsets had no effect on Treg cell development, either in wild-type (WT) or Il15(-/-) mice. Deletion of Il2 in T cells had minimal effects in WT mice but virtually eliminated developing Treg cells in Il15(-/-) mice. In the spleen and most peripheral lymphoid organs, deletion of IL2 in B cells, DCs, or both subsets had no effect on Treg cell homeostasis. In contrast, deletion of IL2 in T cells led to a significant decrease in Treg cells in either WT or Il15(-/-) mice. The one exception was the mesenteric lymph nodes where significantly fewer Treg cells were observed when IL2 was deleted in both T cells and DCs. Thus, T cells are the sole source of IL-2 needed for Treg cell development, but DCs can contribute to Treg cell homeostasis in select organs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available