4.7 Article

Monitoring the degradation of physical properties and fire hazards of high-impact polystyrene composite with different ageing time in natural environments

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 352, Issue -, Pages 92-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.03.033

Keywords

High-impact polystyrene; Physical properties; Fire hazard; Ageing test; Natural environment

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0302104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51473154, 51303167]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Program [2014J4100174, 201607020028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study aims at monitoring the role of the different natural environments on the physical properties and fire hazards of HIPS composites ageing in Turpan and Qionghai. The results indicated that the chromatic aberration and degradation of surface appearance intensified with the increasing ageing time. More flame retardants migrated and were eroded for HIPS composites ageing in Qionghai than those ageing in Turpan, which was caused by the combination of sunlight, high temperature and rainwater in Qionghai. After degradation in the natural environments, the HIPS composites possessed the lower thermal stability and char residues, more toxic gases release, higher peak heat release rate and fire hazard. For example, the peak heat release rate in Qionghai increased by 88.9%, which is much higher than that of in Turpan (55.6%). Moreover, the tensile strength and elongation at break decreased by 46% and 59% for HIPS composites ageing in Turpan and reduced by 53% and 67% for HIPS composites aged in Qionghai, respectively. The results demonstrate that more serious degradation of physical properties and higher fire hazard for HIPS composites ageing in Qionghai than those in Turpan due to the different natural ageing environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available