4.4 Article

Characteristics of High-Level Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from Retail Chicken Meat in Korea

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 81, Issue 8, Pages 1357-1363

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-046

Keywords

Chicken meat; Ciprofloxacin resistance; Enterococci

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries through the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Research Center Support Program - Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs [716002-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genes encoding ciprofloxacin resistance in enterococci in animals may be transferred to bacteria in the animal gut and to zoonotic bacteria where they could pose a human health hazard. The objective of this study was to characterize antimicrobial resistance in high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant (HLCR) Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from retail chicken meat. A total of 345 enterococci (335 E. faecalis and 10 E. faecium) were isolated from 200 chicken meat samples. Of these, 85 E. faecalis isolates and 1 E. faecium isolate were confirmed as HLCR enterococci. All 86 HLCR enterococci displayed gyrA-parC point mutations consisting of S83[-S801 (94.2%, 81 isolates), S83F-S80[ (2.3%, 2 isolates), S83Y-S80[ (2.3%, 2 isolates), and S83Y-S8OF (1.2%, 1 isolate). Sixty-one (72.9%) of the 86 HLCR enterococci showed multidrug resistance to three to six classes of antimicrobial agents. Multilocus sequence typing revealed that E. faecalis had 17 different sequence types (ST) and E. faecium had I different ST, with ST256 observed most often (44 isolates, 51.8%). Although these results cannot exclude the possibility that pathotypes of enterococci isolated from chicken might represent transmission to or from humans, the foodborne HLCR E. faecalis indicated that the food chain is a potential route of enterococcal infection in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available