Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)

Risk of bias assessment should not go beyond reporting assessment

(2016) Clovis Mariano Faggion   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity

(2016) Hyun-Ju Seo et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Critical appraisal of mixed methods research studies in a systematic scoping review on plural policing: assessing the impact of excluding inadequately reported studies by means of a sensitivity analysis

(2016) Antoinette Verhage et al.   QUALITY & QUANTITY

Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users

(2016) M. Santiago-Delefosse et al.   SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE

Systematic mixed studies reviews: Updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool

(2015) Rafaella Queiroga Souto et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES

External Validity and Model Validity: A Conceptual Approach for Systematic Review Methodology

(2014) Raheleh Khorsan et al.   Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Including systematic reviews in PhD programmes and candidatures in nursing – ‘Hobson's choice’?

(2014) Cecilia Olsson et al.   Nurse Education in Practice

Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews

(2013) Pierre Pluye et al.   Annual Review of Public Health

Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols

(2012) Rahul Mhaskar et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review

(2011) Romina Pace et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES

Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy

(2011) Lisa Hartling et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential

(2011) M. Heyvaert et al.   QUALITY & QUANTITY

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

(2010) Iveta Simera et al.   BMC Medicine

A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed

(2010) Michael Crowe et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?

(2009) Mette Asbjoern Neergaard et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews

(2009) Pierre Pluye et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES