4.7 Article

An index to characterize the spatial distribution of land use within watersheds and implications for river network nutrient removal and export

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 42, Issue 16, Pages 6688-6695

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GL064965

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSCoR in NH Ecosystem and Society EPS [1101245]
  2. Plum Island Ecosystem LTER NSF [OCE-1238212]
  3. National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA10OAR4170082]
  4. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1238212] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Emerging Frontiers
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1049181] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. EPSCoR
  10. Office Of The Director [1101245] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spatial distribution of land use and associated nutrient inputs may influence the efficacy of in-stream nutrient removal; however, the effect of source location on N removal and watershed N export has not been quantified. We present the skewness index, a metric to quantify the spatial distribution of land use within watersheds. Using this index and a river network nitrogen removal model, we quantified the effect of varying the location of developed land use within two watersheds on nutrient removal and export. The quantity and location of developed land use as well as runoff affected nitrogen removal and export. Because river network nitrogen removal is bypassed when sources are skewed toward the watershed mouth, varying the location of land use alone can double aquatic nitrogen removal. Nutrient sources skewed toward the distant headwaters maximized in-stream removal which in turn can reduce watershed export.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available