4.2 Article

Sorption of uranyl ions on TiO2: Effects of pH, contact time, ionic strength, temperature and HA

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 115-123

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.010

Keywords

Sorption; Uranium; TiO2; Ionic strength; Soil humic acid

Funding

  1. Natural National Science Foundation of China [21601169, 41573128, 21601179, 21647009]
  2. Natural National Science Foundation of Gansu Province [17JR5RA309]
  3. Key Laboratory Project of Gansu Province [1309RTSA041]
  4. CAS Light of West China Program
  5. 100-Talent Program from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Lanzhou Center for Oil and Gas Resources, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sorption of U(VI) onto TiO2 as functions of pH, ionic strength, contact time, soil humic acid (SHA), solid-to-liquid ratio and temperature was studied under ambient conditions using batch and spectroscopic approaches. The sorption of U(VI) on TiO2 was significantly dependent on pH and ionic strength. The presence of SHA slightly enhanced the sorption of U(VI) on TiO2 below pH 4.0, while it inhibited U(VI) sorption in the higher pH range. U(VI) sorption on TiO2 was favored at high temperatures, and the sorption process was estimated to be endothermic and spontaneous. Reduction of U(VI) to lower valent species was confirmed by X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy analysis. It is very interesting to find that U(VI) sorption on TiO2 was promoted in solutions with higher back-ground electrolyte concentrations. In the presence of U(VI), higher back-ground electrolyte made more TiO2 particles aggregate through (001) facets, leading more (101) facets to be exposed. Therefore, the reduction of U(VI) was enhanced by the exposed (101) facets and more U(VI) removal was observed. (c) 2018 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available