4.2 Article

Copper nanoparticles toxicity: Laboratory strains verses environmental bacterial isolates

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2018.1429727

Keywords

Nanoparticles; E; coli; environmental isolate; lab strain; toxicity mechanism

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Water and Environmental Technology Center at Arizona State University [NSF 0855802, ASU XUS0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoparticles have emerged as significant environmental contaminants and their impact has been studied using laboratory strains of bacteria. This study focuses on investigating the response of environmental isolate and laboratory strains of E. coli to 50 and 100nm size of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs). The laboratory cultures included pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains. The environmental isolate and the non-pathogenic E. coli strain showed different inactivation patterns. After 2h exposure to 50nm CuNPs, the environmental isolate and the lab strain of E. coli lost 7.22 and 6.47 log; whereas the reduction of 6.16 and 6.68 log resulted after exposure to 100nm CuNPs, respectively. The pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 exposed to 50 and 100nm CuNPs for 2h resulted in 5.24 and 6.54 log reduction, respectively. Although the environmental isolate and the laboratory strains of E. coli showed similar inactivation trends; they exhibited different toxicity elicitation mechanisms after exposure to the CuNPs. The pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains elicited significantly different levels of glutathione reductase (GR) activities, an enzyme critical for protection against radicals. Similarly, the environmental isolate and the lab strains of E. coli exhibited opposite trend in GR activities. These results clearly indicate divergence in the toxicity elicitation in the environmental isolate versus the laboratory strains from exposure to CuNPs, which highlights the need for an in-depth investigation of the impact of NPs on the biological processes and long-term effect of high load of NPs on the stability of aquatic and terrestrial ecologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available