4.5 Article

The additional costs of catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
Volume 43, Issue 10, Pages 1046-1049

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.022

Keywords

Costs analysis; CRBSI; Nonantimicrobial; Candida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The additional costs of health care-associated infections vary depending on the reimbursement systems of different countries. We estimated the additional costs of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CVC-CRBSI) in Japan, which has a universal health insurance system covering all citizens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study. Twenty-two patients with CVC-CRBSI were identified among 2,148 patients treated between October 2011 and May 2014 in the intensive care unit of Tokyo Medical University Hospital (1,015 beds). Twenty-two matched controls were selected on the basis of 5 criteria. The drug and medical material costs and technical fees incurred from the date of catheter insertion until hospital discharge were examined using a fee-for-service system. The additional costs of CVC-CRBSI were calculated as the difference between the costs of cases and controls. The contribution of antimicrobial drugs and the causative microorganism to the additional drug costs were also assessed. Results: The additional costs of CVC-CRBSI were estimated at $57,090 per case. Antimicrobial agents comprised only about 10% of the additional drug costs. The additional costs of Candida infection were almost twice those of CVC-CRBSI caused by other microorganisms. Conclusions: The additional costs of CVC-CRBSI in Japan were estimated at $57,090 per case. Copyright (C) 2015 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available