Journal
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 338-348Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1556264618773883
Keywords
diverse populations; informed consent; interactive multimedia; eIC
Categories
Funding
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Comprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation
- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health [UH2AT00784]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Digital informed consent may better inform individuals about health research and increase participation. In the United States and elsewhere, minorities and rural populations are underrepresented in health research and may benefit from well-designed electronic informed consent (eIC). Seven focus groups were conducted with 50 Caucasian, African American, and rural patients in the United States. Participants were asked their preferences for a paper versus electronic informed consent document. Participants found the e-version easier to use, more interesting, and better for understanding. Minority participants emphasized limited access, computer literacy, and trust barriers to eIC. Rural participants were concerned about accessibility, connectivity, privacy, and confidentiality. People see value in electronic consenting. Researchers should consider barriers to eIC among underrepresented populations before recruitment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available