4.3 Article

Variability in center of pressure position and muscle activation during walking with chronic ankle instability

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 155-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.12.003

Keywords

Ankle sprain; Plantar pressure; Electromyography; Gait

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients exhibit altered gait mechanics. The objective was to identify differences in stride-to-stride variability in the position of the center of pressure (COP) and muscle activity during walking between individuals with and without CAI. Participants (17 CAI; 17 Healthy) walked on a treadmill at 1.3 m/s while surface electromyography (sEMG) of the fibularis longus (FL) and plantar pressure were recorded. The medial-lateral COP position was averaged for each 10% interval of stance and group standard deviations (SD), coefficient of variation (COV), and range for the COP position were compared between groups via independent ttests. Ensemble curves for sEMG amplitude SD were graphed for the entire stride cycle to determine significant differences. The CAI group had increased COP position variability (SD (CAI = 0.79 +/- 0.47 mm, Control = 0.48 +/- 0.17 mm), COV (CAI = 1.47 +/- 0.87 mm, Control = 0.93 +/- 0.33 mm), range (CAI = 2.97 +/- 2.07 mm, Control = 1.72 +/- 0.33 mm, P < .05 for all analyses)) during the first 10% of stance. The CAI group had lower FL sEMG amplitude variability from 1 to 10% (mean difference = 0.014 +/- 0.006), 32-38% (mean difference = 0.013 +/- 0.004) and 56-100% (mean difference = 0.026 +/- 0.01) of the gait cycle. Increased COP variability at initial contact may increase risk of lateral ankle sprains in CAI patients. Decreased sEMG amplitude variability may indicate a constrained sensorimotor system contributing to an inability to adapt to changing environmental demands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available