4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of different cathodes and reaction parameters on the enhancement of the electro-Fenton process

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 808, Issue -, Pages 455-463

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.04.047

Keywords

Heterogeneous electro-Fenton; Taffeta carbon fiber; Unidirectional carbon fiber; Graphite felt; Pyrimethanil; H2O2 production

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  2. ERDF Funds [CTM2014-52471-R, CTQ2015-71650-REDT]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  4. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the degradation of pyrimethanil, a pesticide considered as a model pollutant, by electro-Fenton process was optimized. Thus, three different carbonaceous cathode configurations were selected: taffeta carbon fiber (TCF), unidirectional carbon fiber (UCF), and graphite felt (GF). Initially, the H2O2 production ability of these cathodes was evaluated showing results that varied from around 27 to 12 mg/L for UCF and TCF, respectively. These results are in accordance with the cyclic voltammetry study and the hydrophilic behavior of the different cathodes. The degradation of pyrimethanil by anodic oxidation shows to be significantly less efficient than electro-Fenton treatments with any cathode. However, the best results were obtained when UCF was used, achieving the total removal after 45 min. Working with the best cathode, an estimation of the treatment cost was performed based on the electric consumption and mineralization efficiency of the system working at different intensity values. After 120 min, total degradation of the selected pollutant and total organic carbon reduction between 25 and 45% were achieved. Furthermore, different intermediates generated during the degradation process were identified and suitable degradation pathway was proposed. Finally, a continuous treatment system was evaluated at different flow rates and modeled, showing a good agreement between the theoretical and the experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available