4.2 Article

Homologous Banked Bone Grafts for the Reconstruction of Large Cranial Defects in Pediatric Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 2038-2042

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004716

Keywords

Cranioplasty in growing patients; fresh frozen banked bone grafts; homologous bone grafts; pediatric cranial bone defects

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Autogenous bone represents the best material in pediatric reconstructive cranioplasty because of its compatibility with growth; however, its availability is limited. Alternative use of alloplastic materials would have the advantage of unlimited amount, but shows an increased risk of complications and incompatibility with growth. Fresh frozen banked cadaveric bones could be ideal for the reconstruction of large cranial defects in growing patients, because it offers unlimited amount of structural grafts with biomechanics properties quite similar to the autologous bones. Results: The authors report 2 cases of growing patients (13 months female and 9 years old male) undergoing the reconstruction of large (about 70 cm(2) and 50 cm(2) respectively) cranial vault defects, by using structural homologous banked bone grafts. Analytic main reconstruction materials risks/benefits evaluation, literature review of few previously reported pediatric cranioplasty with homologous bone, and both clinical cases satisfactory radiologic long- term results (beyond 4 years of F.U.) are reported. Conclusion: Structural homologous banked bone grafts appear as a valid solution for pediatric canioplasty reconstruction of wide defects, entailing the advantages of available without limitations and compatibility with future growth. The risk of transmissible infections seems minimal and is totally counterbalanced by the stability of long- term results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available