4.7 Article

Temporal evolution of mantle wedge oxygen fugacity during subduction initiation

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 775-778

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G36742.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  2. Smithsonian Institution's Scholarly Studies Program
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [MARGINS-EAR-0841108]
  4. NSF [MARGINS-EAR-0841006, OCE-0644625]
  5. [NSF MARGINS-EAR-0840862]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arc basalts have a higher proportion of Fe in an oxidized state (Fe3+) relative to Fe2+ compared to mid-oceanic ridge basalts (MORBs), likely because slab-derived fluids oxidize the mantle wedge where subduction zone magmas originate. Yet, the time scales over which oxygen fugacity of the mantle wedge changes during subduction initiation and margin evolution are unknown. Fe speciation ratios show that magmas produced during the early stages of subduction in the Mariana arc record oxygen fugacities similar to 2x more oxidized than MORB. Mantle wedge oxygen fugacity rises by similar to 1.3 orders of magnitude as slab fluids become more involved in melt generation processes, reaching conditions essentially equivalent to the modern arc in just 2-4 m.y. These results constrain existing models for the geochemical evolution of the mantle wedge and suggest that oxidation commences upon subduction initiation and matures rapidly in the portions of the mantle wedge that produce melts. This further implies that sulfide or other reduced phases are not present in the mantle wedge in high enough abundance to prevent oxidation of the magmas that form upon subduction initiation. The arc mantle source is oxidized for the majority of a subduction zone's lifetime, influencing the mobility of multivalent elements during recycling, the degassing of oxidized volcanic volatiles, and the mechanisms for generating continental crust from the immediate onset of subduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available