4.7 Article

Incidence of Hypoglycemia After Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages 2136-2146

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-01695

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Catholic University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: We compared the incidence of hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Design, Setting, and Main Outcome Measures: Randomized, open-label trial conducted at the outpatient obesity clinic in a university hospital in Rome, Italy. The primary aim was the incidence of reactive hypoglycemia (<3.1 mmol/L after 75-g oral glucose load) at 1 year after surgery. Secondary aims were hypoglycemia under everyday life conditions, insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and lipid profile. Results: Of 175 eligible patients, 120 were randomized 1:1 to RYGB or SG; 117 (93%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Reactive hypoglycemia was detected in 14% and 29% of SG and RYGB patients (P = 0.079), respectively, with the effect of treatment in multivariate analysis significant at P = 0.018. Daily hypoglycemic episodes during continuous glucose monitoring did not differ between groups (P = 0.75). Four of 59 RYGB subjects (6.8%) had 1 to 3 hospitalizations for symptomatic hypoglycemia vs 0 in SG. The static beta-cell glucose sensitivity index increased after both treatments (P < 0.001), but the dynamic b-cell glucose sensitivity index increased significantly in SG (P = 0.008) and decreased in RYGB(P = 0.004 for time x treatment interaction). Whole-body insulin sensitivity increased about 10-fold in both groups. Conclusions: We show that reactive hypoglycemia is no less common after SG and is not a safer option than RYGB, but RYGB is associated with more severe hypoglycemic episodes. This is likely due to the lack of improvement of beta-cell sensitivity to changes in circulating glucose after RYGB, which determines an inappropriately high insulin secretion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available