4.7 Article

Accelerated foliar litter humification in forest gaps: Dual feedbacks of carbon sequestration during winter and the growing season in an alpine forest

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages 136-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.11.018

Keywords

Litter humification; Forest gap; Carbon sequestration; Plant-soil feedback; Snow cover; Alpine forest

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270498, 31170423]
  2. National Key Technologies R & D Program of China [2011BAC09B05]
  3. Post-doctoral Foundation of China [2012T50782]
  4. Sichuan Youth Science & Technology Foundation [2012JQ0008, 2012JQ0059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Can forest gaps lead to constrained litter decomposability by redistributing heat and moisture conditions, thereby increasing carbon sequestration from plant to soil via litter humification in alpine forests? We studied mass losses, humic substances, humic acid, fulvic acids, as well humification degrees and humification ratios in six foliar litters with a field litterbag experiment from the gap center, canopy gap and expanded gap to the closed canopy in winter and the growing season in an alpine forest of the east Tibetan Plateau. Humification degrees of 18%45% for birch, 15%-40% for fir, 8%-30% for willow, 14%-26% for cypress, 9%-25% for larch and 7%-19% for azalea foliar litter were observed in forest gaps and the closed canopy over one year of incubation. Small amounts of humic substances accumulated in winter, whereas considerable humic acid accumulated, but fulvic acid mineralized during the growing season. Compared with the closed canopy, foliar litter humification in forest gaps was lower in winter but greater in the growing season, implying a dual role of forest gaps in carbon sequestration between winter and the growing season. Carbon sequestration could be accelerated in forest gaps. Reduced snow cover under a scenario of winter warming would stimulate soil carbon storage in these alpine forests. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available