4.6 Article

Building a database for brain 18 kDa translocator protein imaged using [11C]PBR28 in healthy subjects

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1138-1147

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X18771250

Keywords

Translocator protein; [C-11]PBR28; high-affinity binder; mixed-affinity binder; distribution volume

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health, NIH [ZIAMH002852, ZIAMH002793]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) has been widely imaged as a marker of neuroinflammation using several radioligands, including [C-11]PBR28. In order to study the effects of age, sex, and obesity on TSPO binding and to determine whether this binding can be accurately assessed using fewer radio high-performance liquid chromatography (radio-HPLC) measurements of arterial blood samples, we created a database of 48 healthy subjects who had undergone [C-11]PBR28 scans (23 high-affinity binders (HABs) and 25 mixed-affinity binders (MABs), 20 F/28 M, age: 40.6 +/- 16.8 years). After analysis by Logan plot using 23 metabolite-corrected arterial samples, total distribution volume (V-T) was found to be 1.2-fold higher in HABs across all brain regions. Additionally, the polymorphism plot estimated nondisplaceable uptake (V-ND) as 1.40 mL center dot cm(-3), which generated a specific-to-nondisplaceable ratio (BPND) of 1.6 +/- 0.6 in HABs and 1.1 +/- 0.6 in MABs. V-T increased significantly with age in nearly all regions and was well estimated with radio-HPLC measurements from six arterial samples. However, V-T did not correlate with body mass index and was not affected by sex. These results underscore which patient characteristics should be accounted for during [C-11]PBR28 studies and suggest ways to perform such studies more easily and with fewer blood samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available