4.4 Article

Gelatin-genipin-based biomaterials for skeletal muscle tissue engineering

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34057

Keywords

gelatin; genipin; skeletal muscle; tissue engineering; muscle regeneration

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG-14442]
  2. Italian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [20/2015, 19/2014]
  3. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research [20129JLHSY_002, RBAP11FXBC_002, RBFR10EGVP_001]
  4. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2011-02346964]
  5. Italian Ministry of University and Research (FIRB Accordo di Programma) [RBAP11Z3YA_003]
  6. Telethon Foundation [GGP11139B, GGP10225, GGP14202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle engineering aims at tissue reconstruction to replace muscle loss following traumatic injury or in congenital muscle defects. Skeletal muscle can be engineered by using biodegradable and biocompatible scaffolds that favor myogenic cell adhesion and subsequent tissue organization. In this study, we characterized scaffolds made of gelatin cross-linked with genipin, a natural derived cross-linking agent with low cytotoxicity and high biocompatibility, for tissue engineering of skeletal muscle. We generated gelatin-genipin hydrogels with a stiffness of 13 kPa to reproduce the mechanical properties characteristic of skeletal muscle and we show that their surface can be topographically patterned through soft lithography to drive myogenic cells differentiation and unidirectional orientation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these biomaterials can be successfully implanted in vivo under dorsal mouse skin, showing good biocompatibility and slow biodegradation rate. Moreover, the grafting of this biomaterial in partially ablated tibialis anterior muscle does not impair muscle regeneration, supporting future applications of gelatin-genipin biomaterials in the field of skeletal muscle tissue repair. (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 2763-2777, 2018.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available