4.5 Article

Biocompatibility and in vivo degradation of chitosan based hydrogels as potential drug carrier

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION
Volume 29, Issue 13, Pages 1515-1528

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2017.1412244

Keywords

Biocompatibility; hydrogel; carboxymethyl chitosan; polylactide; drug delivery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carboxymethyl chitosan-graft-polylactide (CMCS-PLA) and carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) hydrogels were prepared by using 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) as crosslinking agent and catalyst at room temperature. The biocompatibility of the hydrogels was evaluated with the aim of assessing their potential as drug carrier. Various aspects of biocompatibility were considered, including MTT assay, agar diffusion test, release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemolytic test, plasma recalcification time (PRT), and dynamic clotting time. MTT assay showed that the cytotoxicity level of both hydrogels to L-929 cells was 0 or 1. The LDH release of CMCS and CMCS-PLA was 26 and 29%, respectively, which is slightly higher than that of the negative control (21%) and much lower than that of the negative control (87%). The hemolysis ratio of CMCS and CMCS-PLA was 1.4 and 1.7%, respectively, suggesting outstanding anti-hemolysis properties of both materials. The PRT value of CMCS and CMCS-PLA was higher by 77 and 99% than the value of the positive control. All the results revealed that the hydrogels present good cytocompatibility and hemocompatibility in vitro. In vivo degradation and tissue compatibility were evaluated by subcutaneous injection in the dorsal area of rats. CMCS and CMCS-PLA hydrogels were completely degraded and the inflammatory response also completely disappeared around hydrogels after 19 days in vivo. It is thus concluded that hydrogels formed of CMCS and CMCS-PLA with outstanding biocompatibility are promising as potential drug carrier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available