4.4 Article

Prevalent genotypes of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in recurrent miscarriage and recurrent implantation failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 1437-1442

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1205-6

Keywords

MTHFR; Polymorphism; Genotype; Repeated implantation failure; Recurrent miscarriage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371315, 81601279]
  2. International Cooperation Grant of Shenzhen [GJHZ20140416153718941]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the association of two common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms with recurrent miscarriage (RM) and repeated implantation failure (RIF) The study comprised of 521 patients, with a history of RM (n = 370) or RIF (n = 151). One hundred forty-four women with fallopian tube blockages who had successfully conceived after the first in vitro fertilization embryo transfer treatment served as the control group. The MTHFR alleles, genotypes, and haplotypes were assessed in different groups. There was no difference in allele frequency and distribution of MTHFR polymorphisms between case and control patients. The 1298AA genotype was represented in a higher frequency, and 1298AC genotype was significantly lower in subfertile group when compared to the control group. A significant relationship was found between the 1298AC genotype and the RIF subgroup. The haplotype 677CC/1298AA was overrepresented in the RM subgroup (> 2 times) and haplotype 677CC/1298AC was underrepresented in the RIF subgroup (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, these two haplotypes were not connected to fertilization and embryo cleavage rates. Our findings indicate that the MTHFR gene polymorphism might play a role in the etiology of patients with RM or RIF. No adverse effects of different MTHFR haplotypes on embryo development were detected. Further studies on the biological role are needed to better understand the susceptibility to pregnancy complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available