4.6 Article

Treatment Success Following Joint Arthroplasty: Defining Thresholds for the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 2392-2397

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.062

Keywords

arthroplasty; methodology; Oxford Hip Score; Oxford Knee Score; treatment success; thresholds

Categories

Funding

  1. Stryker [RB0415]
  2. University of Innsbruck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Patient-reported outcome scores are the mainstay method for quantifying success following arthroplasty. However, it is unclear when a successful outcome is achieved. We calculated threshold values for the Oxford Hip and Knee Score (OHS and OKS) representing achievement of a successful treatment at 12-month follow-up. Methods: Questionnaires were administered to patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty before and 12 months after surgery alongside questions assessing key aspects of treatment success. A composite success criterion was used to perform receiver operator characteristic analysis. Thresholds providing maximum sensitivity and specificity were determined for the total sample and subgroups defined by presurgery scores. Results: Data were available for 3203 THA and 2742 TKA patients. Applying the composite treatment success criterion, 67.3% of the TKA and 77.6% of the THA sample reported treatment success. Accuracy for predicting treatment success was high for the OHS and OKS (both areas under the curve, 0.87). For the OHS, a threshold value of 37.5 points showed highest sensitivity and specificity in the total sample, while for the OKS the optimal threshold was 32.5 points. Depending on presurgery scores, optimal thresholds varied between 32.5 and 38.5 for the OHS and 28.5 and 36.5 for the OKS. Conclusion: This is the first study to apply a composite success anchor to the OHS and OKS to evaluate outcome following total joint arthroplasty. Notably fewer patients report a successful outcome using a composite outcome threshold than report being satisfied. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Orthopedics

Survivorship and functional outcome of a cemented acetabular component with bulk roof autograft for severe acetabular dysplasia: 12-to 23-year follow-up

Nick D. Clement, Reynard J. Immelman, Deborah MacDonald, Steffen J. Breusch, Colin R. Howie

Summary: The study aimed to evaluate the survival and clinical outcome of a cemented acetabular component with bulk roof autograft for acetabular dysplasia with a minimum of 12 years follow-up. The results showed that this method provided excellent survival, good to excellent functional outcome, and high patient satisfaction in the medium- to long-term.

HIP INTERNATIONAL (2023)

Article Orthopedics

Fractures in elderly mice demonstrate delayed ossification of the soft callus: a cellular and radiographic study

N. D. Clement, M. S. Gaston, A. H. Simpson

Summary: The objective of this study was to assess the cellular age-related changes in fracture repair and relate these to the observed radiographic assessments at differing time points. The results showed that elderly mice demonstrated a delay in endochondral ossification which was associated with a decreased relative bone mineral content at the fracture site.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Patient-reported outcome measures for physical function in cancer patients: content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, FACT-G, and PROMIS measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

T. Schurr, F. Loth, E. Lidington, C. Piccinin, J. Arraras, M. Groenvold, B. Holzner, M. van Leeuwen, M. A. Petersen, H. Schmidt, T. Young, J. M. I. Giesinger, Juan I. Arraras, Mogens Groenvold, Marieke van Leeuwen

Summary: This study compared the content of commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for physical function (PF) in cancer patients and found conceptual differences among them. The findings provide a better understanding for establishing common metrics.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2023)

Article Oncology

Patient-reported outcome measures for emotional functioning in cancer patients: Content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, FACT-G, HADS, SF-36, PRO-CTCAE, and PROMIS instruments

Maria Rothmund, Micha J. J. Pilz, Nathalie Egeter, Emma Lidington, Claire Piccinin, Juan I. I. Arraras, Mogens Gronvold, Bernhard Holzner, Marieke van Leeuwen, Morten Aa. Petersen, Heike Schmidt, Teresa Young, Johannes M. M. Giesinger, EORTC Quality Life Grp

Summary: This study compared the content of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and found that they cover 132 unique items primarily focusing on emotional functioning, with the majority of items falling under the third-level category of "emotional functions, other specified".

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (2023)

Article Critical Care Medicine

Lessons learned from hip fracture registries - From the Scottish perspective to global practice

Navnit S. Makaram, Andrew J. Hall, Nicholas D. Clement, Alasdair J. MacLullich, A. Hamish R. W. Simpson

Summary: Hip fracture is a common and serious orthopaedic injury among older people. In Scotland, the number of hip fractures is expected to rise from 7,000 to 10,300 per year by 2029. This narrative review discusses the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit, its impact on improving hip fracture care and outcomes, and the current status of hip fracture registries around the world. Future directions for improving hip fracture care through data collection and standardization are also explored.

INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The estimand framework had implications in time to patient-reported outcomes deterioration analyses in cancer clinical trials

Francesco Cottone, Fabio Efficace, David Cella, Neil K. Aaronson, Johannes M. Giesinger, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Christophe Louvet, Emilie Charton, Gary S. Collins, Amelie Anota

Summary: This study applied the estimand framework to analyze time to deterioration in patient-reported outcomes. The results showed significant differences in estimates depending on the statistical methods used, especially when considering death as a competing risk. Therefore, the Fine-Gray competing risks model should be considered to reflect the patient's experience of the disease and treatment burden.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Article Orthopedics

Cost-utility analysis of total knee arthroplasty using 10-year data from a randomised controlled trial: Implant design influences quality-adjusted life year gain

B. Chen, N. D. Clement, D. MacDonald, D. F. Hamilton, P. Gaston

Summary: This study performed a cost-utility analysis for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a 10-year follow up period. The Triathlon group had a significantly greater QALY gain compared with the Kinemax group at 10 years. The 3.5% annual discounts for QALY gain were the most accurate.
Article Orthopedics

Fifteen- year prospective longitudinal cohort study of outcomes following single radius total knee arthroplasty

C. E. H. Scott, G. T. Snowden, W. Cawley, K. R. Bell, D. J. MacDonald, G. J. Macpherson, L. Z. Yapp, N. D. Clement

Summary: This study examines the long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following cemented single radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The results show significant and sustained improvements in PROMs, with the highest scores for Oxford Knee Score (OKS) observed at five years and for physical health at one year. Patient satisfaction remained high at 15 years.

BONE & JOINT OPEN (2023)

Article Orthopedics

Primary knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis restores patients' health-related quality of life to normal population levels

L. Z. Yapp, C. E. H. Scott, D. J. MacDonald, C. R. Howie, A. H. R. W. Simpson, N. D. Clement

Summary: This study aimed to investigate whether primary knee arthroplasty (KA) restores health-related quality of life (HRQoL) to levels expected in the general population. Using retrospective case-control design, HRQoL data from patients undergoing KA were compared with data from the Health Survey for England. The results showed that patients awaiting KA had poorer HRQoL compared to the general population, but one year after surgery, their HRQoL improved significantly and reached levels similar to their matched peers.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2023)

Article Orthopedics

Golf participation after rotator cuff repair: functional outcomes, rate of return and factors associated with return to play

Thomas R. Williamson, Patrick G. Robinson, Iain R. Murray, Andrew D. Murray, Julie M. McBirnie, C. Michael Robinson, Deborah J. MacDonald, Nicholas D. Clement

Summary: This study aimed to determine the level of return to golf following rotator cuff repair, the barriers to return, and factors associated with failure to return. The results showed that 76.3% of patients successfully returned to golf, mostly to their previous performance level, and had improved quality of life. Persistent shoulder dysfunction was the primary barrier to return.

CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW (2023)

Article Orthopedics

Nexus Evaluation Primary Trident II UNcemented shEll (NEPTUNE)

D. F. Hamilton, P. Gaston, G. J. Macpherson, P. Simpson, N. D. Clement

Summary: The primary aim of this study is to assess the survival of the uncemented hydroxyapatite coated Trident II acetabular component as part of a hybrid total hip arthroplasty. The secondary aims include assessing complications, joint-specific function, health-related quality of life, and radiological signs of loosening. This prospective cohort study will recruit 125 patients and assess functional and radiological outcomes up to ten years following the surgery.

BONE & JOINT OPEN (2023)

Article Orthopedics

Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft nonunion risk: a feasibility and proof of concept study

William M. Oliver, Jamie A. Nicholson, Katrina R. Bell, Thomas H. Carter, Timothy O. White, Nicholas D. Clement, Andrew D. Duckworth, A. Hamish R. W. Simpson

Summary: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and reliability of ultrasound in evaluating humeral shaft fracture healing, as well as the accuracy of 6-week ultrasound in predicting nonunion. The results showed that ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing was feasible, reliable, and may predict nonunion.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY (2023)

No Data Available