4.3 Review

Genome-wide association study of body weight in Wenshang Barred chicken based on the SLAF-seq technology

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GENETICS
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 305-312

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13353-018-0452-7

Keywords

Body weight; Genome-wide association study; SLAF-seq; Wenshang Barred chicken

Funding

  1. Youth Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2015YQN53]
  2. Jinan Layer Experiment Station of China Agriculture Research System [CARA-40-S12]
  3. Major Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2014CZ003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chicken body weight (BW) is an economically important trait, and many studies have been conducted on genetic selection for BW. However, previous studies have detected functional chromosome mutations or regions using gene chips. The present study used the specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) technology to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on purebred Wengshang Barred chicken. A total of 1,286,715 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected, and 175,211 SNPs were selected as candidate SNPs for genome-wide association analysis using TASSEL general linear models. Six SNP markers reached genome-wide significance. Of these, rs732048524, rs735522839, rs738991545, and rs15837818 were significantly associated with body weight at 28 days (BW28), while rs314086457 and rs315694878 were significantly associated with BW120. These SNPs are close to seven genes (PRSS23, ME3, FAM181B, NABP1, SDPR, TSSK6L2, and RBBP8). Moreover, 24 BW-associated SNPs reached suggestive genome-wide significance. Of these, 6, 13, 1, and 4 SNPs were associated with BW28, BW56, BW80, and BW120, respectively. These results would enrich the studies on BW and promote the use of Chinese chicken, especially the Wenshang Barred chicken.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available