4.2 Article

Analysis of Bisphenol A, Alkylphenols, and Alkylphenol Ethoxylates in NIST SRM 2585 and Indoor House Dust by Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS/MS)

Journal

JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 246-254

Publisher

AOAC INT
DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0071

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Ingestion of house dust has been demonstrated to be an important exposure pathway to several contaminants in young children. These compounds include bisphenol A (BPA), alkyiphenols (APs), and alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs). Analysis of these compounds in house dust is challenging because of the complex composition of the sample matrix. Objective: The objective was to develop a simple and sensitive method to measure BPA, APs, and APEOs in indoor house dust. Methods: An integrated method that involved solvent extraction using sonication, sample cleanup by solid-phase extraction, derivatization by 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)acetamide, and analysis by GC coupled with tandem MS was developed for the simultaneous determination of BPA, APs, and APEOs in NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2585 (Organic contaminants in house dust) and in settled house dust samples. Results: Target analytes included BPA, 4-tert-octylphenol (OP), OP monoethoxylate, OP diethoxylate, 4-n-nonylphenol (4nNP), 4nNP monoethoxylate (4nNP(1)EO), branched nonylphenol (NP), NP monoethoxylate, NP diethoxylate, NP triethoxylate, and NP tetraethoxylate. The method was sensitive, with method detection limits ranging from 0.05 to 5.1 pg/g, and average recoveries between 82 and 115%. All target analytes were detected in SRM 2585 and house dust except 4nNP and 4nNP(1)EO. Conclusions: The method is simple and fast, with high sensitivity and good reproducibility. It is applicable to the analysis of target analytes in similar matrixes, such as sediments, soil, and biosolids. Highlights: Values measured in SRM 2585 will be useful for future research in method development and method comparison.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available