4.7 Article

Analysis of Escherichia coli STs and resistance mechanisms in sewage from Islamabad, Pakistan indicates a difference in E. coli carriage types between South Asia and Europe

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 73, Issue 7, Pages 1781-1785

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Commonwealth Academic Fellowship [PKCF-2016-156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To discover the Escherichia coli STs and associated resistance mechanisms in the community in Islamabad, Pakistan by analysis of E. coli isolates in sewage. Methods: One hundred and ten E. coli were isolated from sewage across the city of Islamabad without antibiotic bias and confirmed as E. coli by MALDI-TOF MS. Isolates were characterized by fumC/fimH ( CH) typing and coregenome MLST. Resistance mechanisms, virulence genes, phylotypes and plasmid incompatibility types were determined in a subset of isolates by in silico analysis. The genomic position of bla(CTX-M-15) was determined using S1-PFGE, probing and Nanopore MinION sequencing. Results and conclusions: The most prevalent STs were ST394, ST10 and ST648, accounting for 39% of all isolates collected and were found at many sites across Islamabad. Carbapenemase genes were absent and only a single isolate of ST131 was found. The most prevalent resistance mechanisms were qnrS1 and bla(CTX-M-15), with bla(CTX-M-15) penetrating many STs and found in 31% of all collected isolates. However, the majority of the successful STs were bla(CTX-M-15) negative indicating that resistance is not the main driver of prevalence. Twentythree percent of bla(CTX-M-15) genes were chromosomally encoded and large ISEcp1-mediated insertions included qnrS1 and several plasmid genes. In all chromosomally encoded isolates no plasmid copies of blaCTX-M-15 were found. The most prevalent ST (ST394) contained many enteroaggregative E. coli virulence genes and the fimH30 variant allele previously linked to the success of ST131.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available