4.7 Article

Evolution of coke structures during the pyrolysis of bio-oil at various temperatures and heating rates

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 336-342

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.023

Keywords

Bio-oil; Pyrolysis; Coke; Raman; Radical

Funding

  1. Strategic International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation Funds of National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0204000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51606080]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion [FSKLCCB1703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coke can be formed once the bio-oil was heated, even at very low temperatures, causing almost always serious problems in the upgrading and direct utilization of bio-oil. To minimize the negative impacts from coke formation, the key point is to fully understand the formation and evolution of coke during the thermal treatment of bio-oil. Thus, in this study, the cokes formed from the pyrolysis of bio-oil at different temperatures (300-800 degrees C) and heating rates were characterized by using a range of advanced analytical instruments. The evolution of cokes (e.g. morphology, elemental composition, chemical structure and concentration of radicals) with increasing temperature and heating rate was traced. The results show that the cokes generated at slow heating rates are imporous with smooth surface but porous at high temperatures and fast heating rates. The radical concentration of the cokes reaches the highest level at 600 degrees C, then decreases rapidly with further increasing temperature to form more free radicals, which promote the condensation reaction of aromatic systems to form larger ring structures of the coke at high temperatures, with lower H/C and O/C ratios. The O-containing functional groups could be brought into the coke via the interactions between light and heavy components of bio-oil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available