4.5 Article

Structural Anatomical Investigation of Long-Term Memory Deficit in Behavioral Frontotemporal Dementia

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 1887-1900

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170771

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amnesia; behavioral frontotemporal dementia; hippocampus

Categories

Funding

  1. DistALZ
  2. CONICET
  3. CONICYT/FONDECYT [1170010, 1160940]
  4. FONCyT, PICT [2012-0412, 2012-1309]
  5. CONICYT/FONDAP [15150012]
  6. INECO Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although a growing body of work has shown that behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) could present with severe amnesia in approximately half of cases, memory assessment is currently the clinical standard to distinguish bvFTD from Alzheimer's disease (AD). Thus, the concept of relatively preserved episodic memory in bvFTD remains the basis of its clinical distinction from AD and a criterion for bvFTD's diagnosis. This view is supported by the idea that bvFTD is not characterized by genuine amnesia and hippocampal degeneration, by contrast to AD. In this multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the neural correlates of memory performance in bvFTD as assessed by the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Imaging explorations followed a two-step procedure, first relying on a visual rating of atrophy of 35 bvFTD and 34ADpatients' MRI, contrasted with 29 controls; and then using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in a subset of bvFTD patients. Results showed that 43% of bvFTD patients presented with a genuine amnesia. Data-driven analysis on visual rating data showed that, in bvFTD, memory recall & storage performances were significantly predicted by atrophy in rostral prefrontal and hippocampal/perihippocampal regions, similar to mild AD. VBM results in bvFTD (p(FWE)<0.05) showed similar prefrontal and hippocampal regions in addition to striatal and lateral temporal involvement. Our findings

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available