4.5 Review

Rapidly Progressive Alzheimer's Disease: Contributions to Clinical-Pathological Definition and Diagnosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 887-897

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-171181

Keywords

Amyloid-beta; biomarkers; cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; human prions; tau protein

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapidly progressive Alzheimer's disease (rpAD) has recently been recognized as a clinical disease subtype characterized by rapidly progressive cognitive decline and/or short disease duration, and the possible occurrence of early focal neurological signs. Consistently, rpAD represents a relatively frequent alternative diagnosis among cases referred as possible or probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) to surveillance centers for prion disease worldwide. Indeed, the early clinical differential diagnosis between the two disorders can be challenging given the partial overlap in clinical features and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of the protein surrogate markers 14-3-3 and total-tau. Although typical AD and rpAD seem to share the neuropathological core features, recent evidence suggests that a distinctive molecular signature involving the structure of amyloid-beta aggregates and the proteomic landscape of amyloid plaques may distinguish rpAD from typical AD. Here we review clinical, neuropathological, and molecular features and diagnostic findings, including CSF biomarker data, reported to date in rpAD. Furthermore, we summarize the main clinical, pathological and laboratory features of 27 autopsy confirmed cases of rpAD referred to our center. The results of this retrospective analysis, while largely confirming previously published genetic, clinical, and neuropathological data, suggest a higher prevalence of moderate to severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy in rpAD compared to typical AD, a finding to explore further and validate in a larger patient group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available