4.5 Article

Effect of balanced fertilizers on soil quality and lentil yield in Gangetic alluvial soils of India

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
Volume 156, Issue 2, Pages 225-240

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0021859618000254

Keywords

Alluvial soils; lentil; microbial and enzymatic activity; soil quality index; targeted yield equations

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India
  2. All India Coordinated Research Project on Soil Test and Crop Response (AICRP on STCR), Bhopal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Declining pulse production has caused wide concern in recent years. A field experiment was conducted to investigate effects of balance fertilizers based on soil test values and targeted yield equations on soil biological activities, soil quality, nutrient acquisition and grain yield of lentil. Treatments included the use of farmyard manure (FYM), bio-inoculants and inorganic fertilizers at different rates and combinations. The results revealed significant improvement in nodulation, microbial counts, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), soil respiration, soil enzymes and soil organic carbon (SOC) with integrated approaches (i.e. fertilizer plus FYM or bio-inoculants); these improvements led to achievement of the specific target yield of 1.50 t/ha. Although the highest yield was achieved with fertilizers applied for a target yield of 2.0 t/ha, there was significant decline in nodulation, microbial counts, MBC, soil respiration, soil enzymes, SOC and soil quality. Correlation between soil quality index (SQI) and grain yield suggested a significant influence of balanced fertilization based on soil tests and target yield. Principal component analysis revealed the average contribution of soil quality indicators towards SQI was in descending order of SOC > acid phosphatase activity > total culturable fungi > available phosphorus > BMC, which are crucial for sustainable lentil production in alluvial soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available