4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Suitability of Pr2-xCaxNiO4+δ as cathode materials for electrochemical devices based on oxygen ion and proton conducting solid state electrolytes

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 45, Issue 25, Pages 13612-13624

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.023

Keywords

SOFC; Pr2NiO4; Ca doping; Doped CeO2; Doped BaCeO3; Anode-supported cell

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-00104]
  2. Government of the Russian Federation [02.A03.21.0006]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [19-19-11003] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to develop economically competitive solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems it is necessary to design new functional materials with the purpose of enhancing their performance, extending operational lifetime and reducing the cost. The present work focuses on the study of Pr2-xCaxNiO4+delta cathode materials prepared by a simple and cheap conventional solid state reaction method. The structure, oxygen nonstoichiometry, electrical properties and chemical compatibility of the materials with a number of well-known oxygen ion and proton conducting electrolytes were systematically investigated. Chemical composition (Ca content) and technological factors (powders pre-history, electrodes' sintering temperature), as well as external parameters (temperature, air humidity) were correlated with the electrochemical performance of the electrodes to determine the optimal compositions and conditions. Based on this study and testing results of the single anode-supported cell with BaCe0.89Gd0.1Cu0.01O3-delta electrolyte, the Pr1.7Ca0.3NiO4+delta-based electrode compositions are proposed for preferred usage in SOFCs in place of Pr2NiO4+delta electrode. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available