4.7 Article

A novel comprehensive procedure for determination of optimum operating conditions for cleaner energy production system

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 3339-3350

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.4088

Keywords

direct alcohol fuel cell; electrodes design; evolutionary approach; power density

Funding

  1. Sailing Plan of Guangdong Province, China
  2. Shantou University Scientific Research Foundation [NTF 16002]
  3. State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (Huazhong University of Science and Technology) [DMETKF2018019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cleaner energy production system such as direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFCs) are considered as an alternative source for generating cleaner energy. Studies based on design of catalysts, electrodes design, proton exchange membrane, and flow field were conducted for improving its performance characteristic such as power density. However, the less focus was paid on determining the operating conditions considering the uncertainties that will result in an increase of power density of DAFCs. Therefore, the present work proposes a novel comprehensive procedure involving experimental study and evolutionary approach of genetic programming (GP) in formulation of robust power density models for DAFCs. Two uncertainties such as the selection of objective function and variations in measurement of operating conditions are incorporated in framework of GP. The power density models incorporate the formulation of new objective function in GP that will result in higher accuracy of the models. Experiments performed on DAFCs validate performance of the models. Simulation profiler is then generated for models to verify its robustness in uncertain operating conditions. The inferences on relationships between power density and operating conditions for DAFCs are made by surface analysis of the models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available