4.6 Article

Assessment of power grid vulnerabilities accounting for stochastic loads and model imprecision

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.11.047

Keywords

Vulnerability assessment; Contingency ranking; Power grid; Uncertainty; Overload cascading failures; Spectral graph metrics

Funding

  1. ESRC Centre for Doctoral Training on Quantification and Management of Risk & Uncertainty in Complex Systems Environments [EP/L015927/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1556567] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vulnerability and robustness are major concerns for future power grids. Malicious attacks and extreme weather conditions have the potential to trigger multiple components outages, cascading failures and large blackouts. Robust contingency identification procedures are necessary to improve power grids resilience and identify critical scenarios. This paper proposes a framework for advanced uncertainty quantification and vulnerability assessment of power grids. The framework allows critical failure scenarios to be identified and overcomes the limitations of current approaches by explicitly considering aleatory and epistemic sources of uncertainty modelled using probability boxes. The different effects of stochastic fluctuation of the power demand, imprecision in power grid parameters and uncertainty in the selection of the vulnerability model have been quantified. Spectral graph metrics for vulnerability are computed using different weights and are compared to power-flow-based cascading indices in ranking N-1 line failures and random N-k lines attacks. A rank correlation test is proposed for further comparison of the vulnerability metrics. The IEEE 24 nodes reliability test power network is selected as a representative case study and a detailed discussion of the results and findings is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available