Systematic comparative validation of self-report measures of sedentary time against an objective measure of postural sitting (activPAL)
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Systematic comparative validation of self-report measures of sedentary time against an objective measure of postural sitting (activPAL)
Authors
Keywords
Sitting, Physical activity, Surveillance, Sedentary behaviour, Validation, Questionnaires, activPAL, Measurement
Journal
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-02-27
DOI
10.1186/s12966-018-0652-x
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review
- (2017) PM Dall et al. BMJ Open
- Is questionnaire-based sitting time inaccurate and can it be improved? A cross-sectional investigation using accelerometer-based sitting time
- (2017) Nidhi Gupta et al. BMJ Open
- Validity and reliability of the activPAL3 for measuring posture and stepping in adults and young people
- (2016) Ceri Sellers et al. GAIT & POSTURE
- Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered
- (2016) Paul Kelly et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Differentiating Sitting and Lying Using a Thigh-Worn Accelerometer
- (2016) KATE LYDEN et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Identifying adults’ valid waking wear time by automated estimation in activPAL data collected with a 24 h wear protocol
- (2016) Elisabeth A H Winkler et al. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
- Sedentary Time and Its Association With Risk for Disease Incidence, Mortality, and Hospitalization in Adults
- (2015) Aviroop Biswas et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reliability and validity of three questionnaires measuring context-specific sedentary behaviour and associated correlates in adolescents, adults and older adults
- (2015) Cedric Busschaert et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Correction: Development of a Consensus Taxonomy of Sedentary Behaviors (SIT): Report of Delphi Round 1
- (2014) Sebastien Francois Martin Chastin et al. PLoS One
- Adults’ Past-Day Recall of Sedentary Time
- (2013) BRONWYN K. CLARK et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Validation of a Previous-Day Recall Measure of Active and Sedentary Behaviors
- (2013) CHARLES E. MATTHEWS et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”
- (2012) Sedentary Behaviour Research Networ Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
- Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe
- (2012) S. W. Ng et al. Obesity Reviews
- Measurement of Adults' Sedentary Time in Population-Based Studies
- (2011) Genevieve N. Healy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003–06
- (2011) Genevieve N. Healy et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Cohort Profile: The Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936
- (2011) I. J. Deary et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Validation of Wearable Monitors for Assessing Sedentary Behavior
- (2011) SARAH KOZEY-KEADLE et al. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
- Cohort Profile: West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study: Health in the Community
- (2008) M. Benzeval et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Why Bland–Altman plots should useX, not (Y+X)/2 whenX is a reference method
- (2007) Jan S. Krouwer STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started