4.3 Article

Development of a Utility Negative Ion Test Equipment With RF Source at ASIPP

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 1149-1155

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2017.2771825

Keywords

Negative-ion source; neutral beam injection (NBI); RF-ion source

Funding

  1. Key Program of Research and Development of Hefei Science Center, CAS [2016HSC-KPRD002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11405207, 11505224, 11505225, 11575240, 11675215, 11675216]
  3. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2014DFG61950]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An RF-driven negative-ion source development program has been started at ASIPP-Hefei with a small test equipment, Hefei utility negative ion test equipment with RF source (HUNTER). It is devoted to some crucial issues of the RF-driven negative-ion source, such as the improvement of RF efficiency, the enhancement of the extracted negative-ion current density, and the promotion of the beam qualities. In the initial stage, the HUNTER negative-ion source conservatively adopted a similar structure of the ITER prototype source developed at IPP, Garching. It consists of single or double RF driver on the back side of a plasma expansion chamber, and a negative ion accelerator which is able to extract 120 beamlets up to 60 kV for 10 s. In the first phase operation of the HUNTER-ion source, a low-pressure (0.3 Pa) plasma has been successfully achieved by coupling 46-kW RF input power and different plasma parameters have been measured by using Langmuir probes and optical emission spectroscopy. Besides the negative-ion source, the HUNTER comprises the vacuum vessel, the special cooling system, the power supply system, and the source plasma and beam diagnostic system are also ready for the next phase operation of hydrogen negative ion beam extraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available