Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
Authors
Keywords
Spine outcome, Persian, Reliability, Validity, Factor analysis
Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-05-15
DOI
10.1186/s12955-018-0928-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Oswestry Disability Index, confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 35,263 verifies a one-factor structure but practicality issues remain
- (2017) Charles Philip Gabel et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Cross-cultural validation of simplified Chinese version of spine functional index
- (2017) Xiao-Yi Zhou et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index
- (2017) Tae-Sung In Journal of Physical Therapy Science
- Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2016) A. Chiarotto et al. PHYSICAL THERAPY
- Translation, Validation, and Crosscultural Adaptation of the Hebrew Version of the Neck Disability Index
- (2016) Anat Shashua et al. SPINE
- Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire
- (2016) Gurkan Gunaydin et al. SPINE
- The effects of movement speed on kinematic variability and dynamic stability of the trunk in healthy individuals and low back pain patients
- (2015) Morteza Asgari et al. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
- Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
- (2015) Eda Tonga et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI)
- (2015) Eda Tonga et al. Journal of Hand Therapy
- Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Functional Rating Index for Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain in Mainland China
- (2015) Xianzhao Wei et al. SPINE
- The Oswestry Disability Index (Version 2.1a)
- (2015) Miranda L. van Hooff et al. SPINE
- A Systematic Review of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Neck Disability Index
- (2015) Min Yao et al. SPINE
- Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index
- (2014) Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Neck and back pain specific outcome assessment questionnaires in the Spanish language: a systematic literature review
- (2013) Donald R. Murphy et al. Spine Journal
- Confirmatory factory analysis of the Neck Disability Index in a general problematic neck population indicates a one-factor model
- (2013) Charles Philip Gabel et al. Spine Journal
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Assessing Dimensionality and Responsiveness of Outcomes Measures for Patients with Low Back Pain
- (2010) Josh Cleland et al. Pain Practice
- The development and validation of the Unidimensional Fatigue Impact Scale (U-FIS)
- (2009) DM Meads et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Psychological Factors in the Use of the Neck Disability Index in Chronic Whiplash Patients
- (2009) Howard Vernon et al. SPINE
- Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders
- (2009) Brian A. Young et al. Spine Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started