The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Right to Know: A Revised Standard for Reporting Incidental Findings
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 22-32
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-04-06
DOI
10.1002/hast.836
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Sarah S. Kalia et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Oncologists’ and cancer patients’ views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study
- (2016) Stacy W. Gray et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Freedom of Choice About Incidental Findings Can Frustrate Participants' True Preferences
- (2015) Jennifer Viberg et al. BIOETHICS
- Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings
- (2015) Anne Marie Jelsig et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- When Should Genome Researchers Disclose Misattributed Pahentage?
- (2015) Amulya Mandava et al. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Meta consent: a flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research
- (2015) T. Ploug et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Meta consent: a flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research
- (2015) T. Ploug et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Autonomy, the Right Not to Know, and the Right to Know Personal Research Results: What Rights are There, and Who Should Decide about Exceptions?
- (2015) Gert Helgesson JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS
- The “Right Not to Know” in the Genomic Era: Time to Break From Tradition?
- (2014) Benjamin E. Berkman et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?
- (2013) Catherine Gliwa et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
- (2013) Robert C. Green et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases
- (2013) Erika Kleiderman et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing
- (2013) Megan Allyse et al. TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
- “I want to know what's in Pandora's box”: Comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing
- (2012) Anne Townsend et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- The Meaning of Genetic Research Results: Reflections from Individuals with and without a Known Genetic Disorder
- (2012) R. Jean Cadigan et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Researcher Perspectives on Disclosure of Incidental Findings in Genetic Research
- (2010) Meredith C. Meacham et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research
- (2008) Juli Murphy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations
- (2008) Susan M. Wolf et al. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started