4.6 Article

A closely-related clade of globally distributed bloom-forming cyanobacteria within the Nostocales

Journal

HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 93-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2018.05.009

Keywords

Genomics; Metagenomics; Filamentous cyanobacteria

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey [2012OR127G]
  2. Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Mabel E. Pernot Trust
  4. NL Tartar Research Fellowship
  5. Erb Family Foundation through the University of Michigan Water Center [N017871]
  6. National Science Foundation [NSF OCE 1736629]
  7. Research Council of Lithuania [S-LJB-17-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to better understand the relationships among current Nostocales cyanobacterial blooms, eight genomes were sequenced from cultured isolates or from environmental metagenomes of recent planktonic Nostocales blooms. Phylogenomic analysis of publicly available sequences placed the new genomes among a group of 15 genomes from four continents in a distinct ADA Glade (Anabaena/Dolichospenruun/Aphanizomenon) within the Nostocales. This Glade contains four species-level groups, two of which include members with both Anabaena-like and Aphanizomenon-flos-aquae-like morphology. The genomes contain many repetitive genetic elements and a sizable pangenome, in which ABC-type transporters are highly represented. Alongside common core genes for photosynthesis, the differentiation of N-2-fixing heterocysts, and the uptake and incorporation of the major nutrients P, N and S, we identified several gene pathways in the pangenome that may contribute to niche partitioning. Genes for problematic secondary metabolites-cyanotoxins and taste-and-odor compounds-were sporadically present, as were other polyketide synthase (PKS) and nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) gene clusters. By contrast, genes predicted to encode the ribosomally generated bacteriocin peptides were found in all genomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available