Journal
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 680-683Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1427715
Keywords
Freeze-all; poor response; in vitro fertilization; ovarian stimulation; cryopreservation
Funding
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY17H040002]
- Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2018C37126]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This retrospective study determined the efficacy of the 'freeze-all' embryo strategy in poor ovarian responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 559 poor responders who met Bologna criteria between January 2012 and December 2014 were included in this study: 256 in the fresh embryo transfer group and 303 in the freeze-all group. Vitrification and warming of day 3 embryos were performed using the Cryotop method. The poor responders treated with fresh embryo transfer and those treated with freeze-all strategy showed similar live birth rates per cycle (12.1% vs. 16.2%, p=.172) and per transfer (15.9% vs. 20.9%, p=.182). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that maternal age at retrieval (odds ratio, 0.919; 95% confidence interval, 0.865-0.977; p=.006) and number of good-quality embryos transferred (odds ratio, 1.953; 95% confidence interval, 1.346-2.835; p<.001) were significantly associated with the live birth rate. Freeze-all cycle is an acceptable treatment in poor ovarian responders, and it should be suggested by physicians as an alternative to cycle cancelation in case in which a fresh transfer would not be advantageous.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available