4.4 Article

Cryopreservation of amniotic membrane with and without glycerol additive

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-3973-1

Keywords

Amniotic membrane; Ocular surface; Wound healing; Storage

Categories

Funding

  1. Cornea Bank Aachen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Amniotic membrane (AM) is an essential tool in ocular surface reconstruction. In this study, we analyzed the differential effects of glycerol and straight storage at - 80 degrees C for up to 6 months on the structural, biological, and mechanical properties of amniotic membrane (AM). Methods Human placentae of 11 different subjects were analyzed. AMs were stored at -80 degrees C, either with a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium and glycerol (glycerol) or without any medium or additives (straight). Histological image analysis, tensile strength, cell viability, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) secretion were evaluated at 0.5, 1, 3, and 6 months. Results Histologically, neither glycerol nor straight storage significantly altered the epithelial or stromal structure of the AM. However, the cell number of the stroma was significantly reduced during the freezing process, independently of the storage method (p = 0.05-0.001). Tensile strength and Young's modulus were not influenced by the storage method, but longer storage periods significantly increased the tensile strength of the AMs (p = 0.028). Cell viability was higher in glycerol rather than straight AM samples for up to 3 months of storage (p = 0.047-0.03). Secretion of bFGF at 3 months of storage was significantly higher in glycerol versus straight frozen AM samples (p = 0.04). Discussion Glycerol led to higher cell viability and higher bFGF secretion for up to 3 months of AM storage. However, no significant differences between the two methods were observed at 6 months of storage at -80 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available