4.7 Article

Enduring epigenetic landmarks define the cancer microenvironment

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 625-638

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.229070.117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Australia [1044458]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council [535903, 1070418, 1106870, 1063559, 1002648, 1102752, 1035721, 1058540]
  3. Cancer Institute of New South Wales Fellowship [14/ECF/1-23]
  4. Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-NSW
  5. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (Movember Young Investigator Grant) [YI0911]
  6. Victorian Cancer Agency
  7. RT Hall Trust
  8. TissuPath Pathology
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1102752, 1106870, 1070418, 1058540] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth and progression of solid tumors involves dynamic cross-talk between cancer epithelium and the surrounding microenvironment. To date, molecular profiling has largely been restricted to the epithelial component of tumors; therefore, features underpinning the persistent protumorigenic phenotype of the tumor microenvironment are unknown. Using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, we show for the first time that cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) from localized prostate cancer display remarkably distinct and enduring genome-wide changes in DNA methylation, significantly at enhancers and promoters, compared to nonmalignant prostate fibroblasts (NPFs). Differentially methylated regions associated with changes in gene expression have cancer-related functions and accurately distinguish CAFs from NPFs. Remarkably, a subset of changes is shared with prostate cancer epithelial cells, revealing the new concept of tumor-specific epigenome modifications in the tumor and its microenvironment. The distinct methylome of CAFs provides a novel epigenetic hallmark of the cancer microenvironment and promises new biomarkers to improve interpretation of diagnostic samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available