4.6 Article

Genomic sequencing identifies secondary findings in a cohort of parent study participants

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 1635-1643

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.53

Keywords

ACMG; Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium; disease risk; genomic sequencing; secondary findings

Funding

  1. US National Human Genome Research Institute [UM1HG007301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Clinically relevant secondary variants were identified in parents enrolled with a child with developmental delay and intellectual disability. Methods: Exome/genome sequencing and analysis of 789 unaffected parents was performed. Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 21 genes within 25 individuals (3.2%), with 11 (1.4%) participants harboring variation in a gene defined as clinically actionable by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. These 25 individuals self-reported either relevant clinical diagnoses (5); relevant family history or symptoms (13); or no relevant family history, symptoms, or clinical diagnoses (7). A limited carrier screen was performed yielding 15 variants in 48 (6.1%) parents. Parents were also analyzed as mate pairs (n = 365) to identify cases in which both parents were carriers for the same recessive disease, yielding three such cases (0.8%), two of which had children with the relevant recessive disease. Four participants had two findings (one carrier and one noncarrier variant). In total, 71 of the 789 enrolled parents (9.0%) received secondary findings. Conclusion: We provide an overview of the rates and types of clinically relevant secondary findings, which may be useful in the design and implementation of research and clinical sequencing efforts to identify such findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available