False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-03-22
DOI
10.1038/gim.2018.38
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration
- (2017) Lauren Badalato et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Clinical laboratories collaborate to resolve differences in variant interpretations submitted to ClinVar
- (2017) Steven M. Harrison et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Laboratory and clinical genomic data sharing is crucial to improving genetic health care: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2017) ACMG Board of Directors GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Classification of Genes: Standardized Clinical Validity Assessment of Gene-Disease Associations Aids Diagnostic Exome Analysis and Reclassifications
- (2017) Erica D. Smith et al. HUMAN MUTATION
- Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study
- (2017) Diane R Koeller et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results
- (2017) J. Scott Roberts et al. Public Health Genomics
- Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Sarah S. Kalia et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Primary care providers’ cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda
- (2016) Jada G. Hamilton et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Sanger Confirmation Is Required to Achieve Optimal Sensitivity and Specificity in Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Testing
- (2016) Wenbo Mu et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
- The genetics of Parkinson's disease
- (2015) Stephen Mullin et al. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
- A global reference for human genetic variation
- (2015) Richard A. Gibbs et al. NATURE
- ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants
- (2015) Melissa J. Landrum et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Actionable, Pathogenic Incidental Findings in 1,000 Participants’ Exomes
- (2013) Michael O. Dorschner et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing
- (2010) Lira Mamanova et al. NATURE METHODS
- Next-generation DNA sequencing
- (2008) Jay Shendure et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started