Measuring coverage and accuracy of whole-exome sequencing in clinical context
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Measuring coverage and accuracy of whole-exome sequencing in clinical context
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-04-12
DOI
10.1038/gim.2018.51
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Standards and Guidelines for Validating Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipelines
- (2018) Somak Roy et al. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
- Comparison of 2 Commercially Available Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms in Oncology
- (2017) Nicole M. Kuderer et al. JAMA Oncology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rare Diseases: The Orphanet Database
- (2017) Sonia Pavan et al. PLoS One
- Novel metrics to measure coverage in whole exome sequencing datasets reveal local and global non-uniformity
- (2017) Qingyu Wang et al. Scientific Reports
- Navigating highly homologous genes in a molecular diagnostic setting: a resource for clinical next-generation sequencing
- (2016) Diana Mandelker et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Sarah S. Kalia et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays
- (2016) Linda Koshy et al. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
- Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans
- (2016) Monkol Lek et al. NATURE
- The Impact of DNA Input Amount and DNA Source on the Performance of Whole-Exome Sequencing in Cancer Epidemiology
- (2015) Q. Zhu et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- A global reference for human genetic variation
- (2015) Richard A. Gibbs et al. NATURE
- New insights into the performance of human whole-exome capture platforms
- (2015) J. Meienberg et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants
- (2015) Melissa J. Landrum et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants
- (2015) Aziz Belkadi et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants
- (2015) Sohyun Hwang et al. Scientific Reports
- Variant detection sensitivity and biases in whole genome and exome sequencing
- (2014) Alison M Meynert et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- Effective filtering strategies to improve data quality from population-based whole exome sequencing studies
- (2014) Andrew R Carson et al. BMC BIOINFORMATICS
- Performance comparison of four exome capture systems for deep sequencing
- (2014) Chandra Sekhar Chilamakuri et al. BMC GENOMICS
- Analytical validation of whole exome and whole genome sequencing for clinical applications
- (2014) Michael D Linderman et al. BMC Medical Genomics
- Incorporation of Pharmacogenomics into Routine Clinical Practice: the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline Development Process
- (2014) Kelly Caudle et al. CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM
- Clinical Interpretation and Implications of Whole-Genome Sequencing
- (2014) Frederick E. Dewey et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Clinical Exome Sequencing for Genetic Identification of Rare Mendelian Disorders
- (2014) Hane Lee et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Comprehensive variation discovery in single human genomes
- (2014) Neil I Weisenfeld et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data
- (2014) Han Fang et al. Genome Medicine
- Practices and Policies of Clinical Exome Sequencing Providers: Analysis and Implications
- (2013) Seema M. Jamal et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing
- (2013) Heidi L. Rehm et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
- (2013) Robert C. Green et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice
- (2012) Amy S Gargis et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- The NIH genetic testing registry: a new, centralized database of genetic tests to enable access to comprehensive information and improve transparency
- (2012) Wendy S. Rubinstein et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- A Likelihood-Based Framework for Variant Calling and De Novo Mutation Detection in Families
- (2012) Bingshan Li et al. PLoS Genetics
- Whole-exome sequencing of DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and EBV-transformed lymphocytes from the same donor
- (2011) Eric R Londin et al. BMC GENOMICS
- Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies
- (2011) Michael J Clark et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions
- (2011) Todd J. Treangen et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries
- (2011) Daniel Aird et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- Comparison of solution-based exome capture methods for next generation sequencing
- (2011) Anna-Maija Sulonen et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- A scalable, fully automated process for construction of sequence-ready human exome targeted capture libraries
- (2011) Sheila Fisher et al. GENOME BIOLOGY
- COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer
- (2010) S. A. Forbes et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started