4.5 Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community-Based Dementia Care Coordination Intervention: Effects of MIND at Home on Caregiver Outcomes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 391-402

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.08.002

Keywords

Dementia; caregiver; care coordination; community-based; intervention

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG038440]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [K01 MH085142]
  3. Associated Jewish Federation of Baltimore
  4. Weinberg Foundation
  5. Forest
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Eisai
  8. Pfizer
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Lilly
  11. Ortho-McNeil
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  13. Novartis
  14. National Football League (NFL)
  15. Elan
  16. Functional Neuromodulation Inc.
  17. Janssen
  18. National Institute of Mental Health/National Institute on Aging [K01 MH085142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess whether MIND at Home, a community-based, multicomponent, care coordination intervention, reduces unmet caregiving needs and burden in informal caregivers of persons with memory disorders. Methods: An 18-month randomized controlled trial of 289 community-living care recipient (CR)-caregiver (informal caregivers, i.e., unpaid individuals who regularly assisted the CR) dyads from 28 postal code areas of Baltimore, Maryland was conducted. All dyads and the CR's primary care physician received the written needs assessment results and intervention recommendations. Intervention dyads then received an 18-month care coordination intervention delivered by nonclinical community workers to address unmet care needs through individualized care planning, referral and linkage to dementia services, provision of caregiver dementia education and skill-building strategies, and care progress monitoring by an interdisciplinary team. Primary outcome was total percent of unmet caregiver needs at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included objective and subjective caregiver burden measures, quality of life (QOL), and depression. Results: Total percent of unmet caregiver needs declined in both groups from baseline to 18 months, with no statistically significant between-group difference. No significant group differences occurred in most caregiver burden measures, depression, or QOL. There was a potentially clinically relevant reduction in self-reported number of hours caregivers spent with the CR for MIND participants compared with control subjects. Conclusion: No statistically significant impacts on caregiver outcomes were found after multiple comparison adjustments. However, MIND at Home appeared to have had a modest and clinically meaningful impact on informal caregiver time spent with CRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available