4.7 Article

The CloudSME simulation platform and its applications: A generic multi-cloud platform for developing and executing commercial cloud-based simulations

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.06.006

Keywords

Multi-cloud simulation; Cloud computing; Workflow; Computational fluid dynamics; Agent-based simulation

Funding

  1. EU FP7 CloudSME project [608886]
  2. EU H2020 COLA project [731574]
  3. EU H2020 Cloudi-Facturing project [768892]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulation is used in industry to study a large variety of problems ranging from increasing the productivity of a manufacturing system to optimising the design of a wind turbine. However, some simulation models can be computationally demanding and some simulation projects require time consuming experimentation. High performance computing infrastructures such as clusters can be used to speed up the execution of large models or multiple experiments but at a cost that is often too much for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). Cloud computing presents an attractive, lower cost alternative. However, developing a cloud-based simulation application can again be costly for an SME due to training and development needs, especially if software vendors need to use resources of different heterogeneous clouds to avoid being locked-in to one particular cloud provider. In an attempt to reduce the cost of development of commercial cloud-based simulations, the CloudSME Simulation Platform (CSSP) has been developed as a generic approach that combines an AppCenter with the workflow of the WS-PGRADE/gUSE science gateway framework and the multi-cloud-based capabilities of the CloudBroker Platform. The paper presents the CSSP and two representative case studies from distinctly different areas that illustrate how commercial multi-cloud-based simulations can be created. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available