4.7 Article

Comparing the effects of CH4, CO2, and N2 injection on asphaltene precipitation and deposition at reservoir condition: A visual and modeling study

Journal

FUEL
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 633-641

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.005

Keywords

Asphaltene precipitation; Enhanced oil recovery; Carbon dioxide injection; Nitrogen injection; Methane injection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oil Recovery (EOR) through various methodologies has been an active research for many years seeking efficient methods to increase the crude oil recovery efficiency from oil reservoirs. Among different gas injection scenarios, carbon dioxide (CO2), natural gas (mainly methane (CH4)) and nitrogen (N-2) injection are considered as promising EOR agents. Asphaltene precipitation and deposition during EOR methods cause severe problems, which affect the recovery efficiency and increase the cost of the incremental oil production. This study is aimed to investigate the effects of CH4 and N-2 injection compared with CO2 injection on asphaltene precipitation and deposition. The different mole percent of the mentioned gases were introduced into the high-pressure cell, then the amount of precipitated asphaltene was measured at the reservoir condition. The evolution of asphaltene deposition was monitored through a high-resolution microscope. Moreover, Image processing software was utilized to check the amount of deposited asphaltene and its size distribution under different conditions. The most apparent finding to emerge from this study is that both CO2 and natural gas increase the amount of precipitated asphaltene whereas the nitrogen as an inert gas has no considerable effect on the amount of precipitated asphaltene. According to the results, the increment of precipitated asphaltene by CO2 is much higher than natural gas. Further, the thermodynamic solid model used in this study reasonably predicted the trend of asphaltene precipitation process for the mentioned EOR scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available